It's A Shame That Nobody Listens

GroovyMusic · Post by **GroovyMusic** » 17 Oct 2006 01:25

arjan wrote:No computer program was involved in the creation of this, except maybe scanning software to turn this classic DIY xerox-and-felt-tip-color-marker cut-and-paste job into a digital image for printing.

Right.

GroovyMusic · Post by **GroovyMusic** » 17 Oct 2006 01:28

fracas64 wrote:I have this one too...got in a trade but wtih a "bonus "track: star spangled banner !!!! AND another artwork!

What other artwork?

Also, if you have this artwork, would you mind providing some better quality scans? BY "better quality" I mean don't scan as JPEG or compress to JPEG. Thanks!

LCB · Post by **LCB** » 17 Oct 2006 03:36

What kinda DPI would you need? I can hook you up.....d'you have Photoshop? .PSD is lossless....but .PNG is too, I think....

GroovyMusic · Post by **GroovyMusic** » 17 Oct 2006 07:01

LCB wrote:What kinda DPI would you need? I can hook you up.....d'you have Photoshop? .PSD is lossless....but .PNG is too, I think....

PNG is probably more conveniant for both of us - if I need to re-edit it I can always just load the PNG into photshop. As far as DPI, as long as it's as big as the actual thing in real life, I don't complain, but taking advantage of optical technology and making it a little bigger couldn't hurt. Thanks a lot.

GroovyMusic · Post by **GroovyMusic** » 17 Oct 2006 09:36

So is anything on this compilation unavilable anywhere else?

LCB · Post by **LCB** » 17 Oct 2006 19:04

GroovyMusic wrote:
LCB wrote:What kinda DPI would you need? I can hook you up.....d'you have Photoshop? .PSD is lossless....but .PNG is too, I think....
PNG is probably more conveniant for both of us - if I need to re-edit it I can always just load the PNG into photshop. As far as DPI, as long as it's as big as the actual thing in real life, I don't complain, but taking advantage of optical technology and making it a little bigger couldn't hurt. Thanks a lot.

check yer pm's

marknaveh · Post by **marknaveh** » 17 Oct 2006 22:43

GroovyMusic wrote:So is anything on this compilation unavilable anywhere else?

Well...that Second Night Sister Ray is kind of hard to find. That's the reason I traded for this one.

GroovyMusic · Post by **GroovyMusic** » 17 Oct 2006 23:36

marknaveh wrote:Well...that Second Night Sister Ray is kind of hard to find. That's the reason I traded for this one.

It's on ' A Walk With The Velvet Underground' and that version of Sister Ray sucks in my opinion

tarbaby2 · Post by **tarbaby2** » 18 Oct 2006 02:04

Groovy said "...that version of Sister Ray sucks in my opinion."

Well, it certainly isn't as good as some of the other versions. But, I don't think it's all THAT bad. Hey, no one hits a home run every time!