Just noticed this rare photo which has an even earlier published date ? 29th Dec 1970..
May VU debate and the occasional argument carry on for many years Phil!
Lou in colour at Max's
Re: Lou in colour at Max's
Yes all points noted was more following the earlier hairline discussion even if all these pics weren?t taken by Leee on the very same night - the hair is so similar that the pics can?t be months apart.
Just noticed this rare photo which has an even earlier published date ? 29th Dec 1970..
May VU debate and the occasional argument carry on for many years Phil!
Just noticed this rare photo which has an even earlier published date ? 29th Dec 1970..
May VU debate and the occasional argument carry on for many years Phil!
-
velvetfan
- Head held high
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: 16 Mar 2004 03:40
- Location: LaPlace, La USA (New Orleans)
Re: Lou in colour at Max's
Lou smiles?bleach wrote:Yes all points noted was more following the earlier hairline discussion even if all these pics weren?t taken by Leee on the very same night - the hair is so similar that the pics can?t be months apart.
Just noticed this rare photo which has an even earlier published date ? 29th Dec 1970..
May VU debate and the occasional argument carry on for many years Phil!
-
velvetfan
- Head held high
- Posts: 1005
- Joined: 16 Mar 2004 03:40
- Location: LaPlace, La USA (New Orleans)
Re: Lou in colour at Max's
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1988-Press-Phot ... 3a731904f9
I think there has been a mistake?? Hilarious.
I think there has been a mistake?? Hilarious.
Re: Lou in colour at Max's
Ha! The hand-written name actually says "Tom Reed."velvetfan wrote:http://www.ebay.com/itm/1988-Press-Phot ... 3a731904f9
I think there has been a mistake?? Hilarious.
Bargain bin gold, favorite bands, concerts, photos, and my record collection: All Good Music