Authenticity and Artifice

For discussion of all aspects of the New York legends.
threechordwonder
Head held high
Posts: 344
Joined: 05 Aug 2008 22:27
Location: Hmpshire, UK

Authenticity and Artifice

Post by threechordwonder »

Article. By Bernardo Alexander Attias.

About "The Velvet Underground and Nico".

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10. ... 16.1155376

Is it valid? Is it crap? Did I understand a single word?
iaredatsun
Now jelly rolls in the street
Posts: 1894
Joined: 08 Jun 2004 21:38
Location: London, Texas

Re: Authenticity and Artifice

Post by iaredatsun »

'Musicians, journalists and academics often hold up the Velvet Underground as the paragon of authenticity in rock music, and the band indeed portrayed itself this way from the outset'

The trouble is I don't think any actually believes that kind of nonsense any more, so the opening statement acts as a straw man set up for the author to practice his critical craft on. Also, taking what Reed said about the band in 1987 as a measure of them portraying themselves as 'authentic' is wrong and is merely an indication of Reed's romantic and nostalgic tendencies getting the better of him in later age. You only have to place the VU in the context of their mentor Warhol (and the art scene in general at that point in time) to understand that authenticity was probably the last thing on anyone's mind. I'll read it later, nonetheless. Thank-you. :)
underground, overground
iaredatsun
Now jelly rolls in the street
Posts: 1894
Joined: 08 Jun 2004 21:38
Location: London, Texas

Re: Authenticity and Artifice

Post by iaredatsun »

'I don't think anyone actually believes'

Whatever happened to infinite editing on the forum?
underground, overground
peppergomez
Head held high
Posts: 591
Joined: 23 Jul 2011 08:58

Re: Authenticity and Artifice

Post by peppergomez »

It was a pretty worthwhile read.
Post Reply