Page 1 of 1
Dead Straight Guide To Velvet Underground And Lou Reed
Posted: 19 Jul 2018 20:49
by bleach
Anyone seen this..any good?
Only complete discography of The Velvet Underground and Lou Reed.
Dead Straight Guide to Velvet Underground and Lou Reed
Series Title: Dead Straight Guides
Publisher: Red Planet Global Book Sales
Book Format: Paperback / softback
Original Languages: English
Number of Pages: 304
Author: Peter Hogan
ISBN-13: 9781911346463
Publication Date: June, 2018
ISBN-10: 1911346466
Re: Dead Straight Guide To Velvet Underground And Lou Reed
Posted: 20 Jul 2018 19:32
by Sheila Klein
Re: Dead Straight Guide To Velvet Underground And Lou Reed
Posted: 21 Jul 2018 18:19
by MJG196
Thanks for the link! I do like how he's up front and honest, explaining that he's essentially compiling all the known info out there and adding on a bit at the end.
You pull no punches when it comes to the protagonists’ works – you state that but for Bowie, Reed’s career might’ve ended after the weak first album, and that certain albums, like Sally Can’t Dance, are poor.
I wonder why authors need to judge the music. I don't want to read ANY author's opinion of whether an album is good/bad - especially in the context of a non-fiction book. Let music critics worry about that. I happen to enjoy SCD for my own reasons, and considering it was his highest charting LP EVER, other people must enjoy it, too.
Re: Dead Straight Guide To Velvet Underground And Lou Reed
Posted: 21 Jul 2018 18:23
by Sheila Klein
I don't want to read ANY author's opinion of whether an album is good/bad - especially in the context of a non-fiction book. Let music critics worry about that.
Where is it written that journalists can't also be critics?
Re: Dead Straight Guide To Velvet Underground And Lou Reed
Posted: 23 Jul 2018 01:21
by MJG196
Sheila Klein wrote: ↑21 Jul 2018 18:23
I don't want to read ANY author's opinion of whether an album is good/bad - especially in the context of a non-fiction book. Let music critics worry about that.
Where is it written that journalists can't also be critics?
Just my preference.