Posted: 18 May 2007 19:51
Page 3 of 5
Posted: 18 May 2007 20:52
those lou shots are just great - many thanks
Posted: 18 May 2007 23:43
any chance of getting high resolution scans?
Posted: 19 May 2007 11:44
Not HQ but this took me by surprise when I did a double take:
Doug & Lou??? Side by side????
Doug & Lou??? Side by side????
Posted: 20 May 2007 03:18
Doug is unrecognisable.jimjim wrote:Not HQ but this took me by surprise when I did a double take:
Doug & Lou??? Side by side????
Posted: 20 May 2007 03:48
Great pictures Bleach. Thanks...
Posted: 20 May 2007 18:19
Maybe, but his voice sure has held up.Move Right In wrote:Doug is unrecognisable.jimjim wrote:Not HQ but this took me by surprise when I did a double take:
Doug & Lou??? Side by side????
Check it out: http://youtube.com/watch?v=rBUqpUgVQoM
and http://youtube.com/watch?v=I_xCTQVXKv4
Sal
Posted: 20 May 2007 18:22
Why so surprised? How much value can you place on 20 or 30 year old comments? Or worse, the comments of uniformed journalists!jimjim wrote:Not HQ but this took me by surprise when I did a double take:
Doug & Lou??? Side by side????
Sal
Posted: 20 May 2007 18:29
**Uninformed **
Posted: 20 May 2007 22:08
I love those test sheets! I used one image a while ago in some cover-art:
