Re: would you follow lou reed if he hadn't been in VU?
Posted: 27 Jan 2018 01:27
While I heard the VU & Nico first, I didn't explore the other albums or solo work right away, mostly because I didn't realize it was a proper band with more albums - I just thought it was an Andy Warhol project because I learned about it in art class. Later on I listened to Transformer when I found out Bowie helped produce it, loved it right away, and got into Lou's solo work and more of the Velvets, Cale, Nico, and Moe Tucker from there. So yes.
But the Velvets are my favourite, so I don't think anything else is quite as good just by definition. It's one of those greater than the sum of their parts deals, and nothing is going to be as good without Moe and Sterling. Still, I think enough of Lou's (and Cale's) albums are great on their own. Transformer, Coney Island Baby, MMM, Street Hassle, The Bells, and the Blue Mask are among my favourites, as are Paris 1919, Fear, and some others, and I think the New York/Drella/Magic and Loss 'trilogy' is a pretty impressive body of work.
But the Velvets are my favourite, so I don't think anything else is quite as good just by definition. It's one of those greater than the sum of their parts deals, and nothing is going to be as good without Moe and Sterling. Still, I think enough of Lou's (and Cale's) albums are great on their own. Transformer, Coney Island Baby, MMM, Street Hassle, The Bells, and the Blue Mask are among my favourites, as are Paris 1919, Fear, and some others, and I think the New York/Drella/Magic and Loss 'trilogy' is a pretty impressive body of work.