A Theory on Live 1969 vs Live At End Cole Avenue
Posted: 17 May 2004 17:42
Hi all
I wrote this some time ago but never got round to "publishing" it on my group jimjims. Feel free to discuss the ideas at length or perhaps offer a different viewpoint.
Sean (aka jimjim)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"...it’s always struck me as odd that in the era that bootlegging was just starting out (Great White Wonder, Get Back & Live R being the 1st 3 to be released that year[1969]) that some dodgy geezers somehow managed to get their hands on high quality, stereo recording equipment to tape their heroes. In addition it also seems odd that they were also sked by the same heroes to come forward to get better sound and then went backstage to tape them in a singalong session. It seems to me very unlikely that someone was that lucky to have all this to hand without “the man” getting suspicious.
One key factor in explaining this is “Live 1969”. It wasn’t until the CD era that we discovered that part of “Live 1969” was taken from fragile acetates as, until then, the vinyl covered all the hidden crack(le)s, so to speak. Perhaps to explain this at the time, it was revealed by some VU aficionados that VU manager Sesnick had handed over mere acetates to Mercury in 1974 for use in this now classic live album. So, when LAECA came out on boot around the same time everyone was stunned by both the appearance of tracks from “Live 1969” and the dramatic difference in sound quality between the official and unofficial versions. The question was asked, “why did Mercury or Sesnick use acetates and not the tape?”. For the moment, we can point the finger at Sesnick for having something to do with the tapes but as yet we do not have the “why?”.
But, there’s one other twist. When putting together LAECA & TFN ["The First Night", its follow-up set] the new bootleggers also discovered a stash of demo tapes tagged on at the end – “I Found A Reason”, “The Countess Of Hong Kong”, “We’re Gonna Have A Real Good Time Together” and “Ride Into The Sun”. These had previously been undocumented and caused a stir when they first appeared at the end of TFN. But also, of interest, it was claimed that these tracks also appeared at the end of the same acetates that were handed over to Mercury all those years ago. When the former two of these tracks were finally released officially in the mid-late 90s it’s interesting that Atlantic were not given a licence credit for using “The Countess..” on PSAS and vice versa for “I Found A Reason” & Polydor in reference to the re-packaged “Loaded”. There is a simple explanation - because neither have the rights to these acetates. Given that the VU were coming to the end of their Verve/MGM contract around the time LAECA was recorded and as both PSAS & Loaded (FLE) claim the demos were recorded not long after, it seems obvious that as no-one has a claim to them, they must have been recorded out of “wedlock”. This may explain why Mercury (who were not then part of Polygram/Universal) were approached over Verve/MGM to release “Live 1969”.
So we have QED: as the idea of a bootlegger in 1969 having access to high quality stereo equipment seems to me very unlikely, is it possible that the source of these tapes is an internal one? Hell, yeah. Either Sesnick or Verve/MGM would be the most likely to have any access to these sorts of things. But Verve wanted to bin the VU at the end of 69 & so that leaves only Sesnick as a source. But why did he record the band independently in demo & live form, then put together an acetate which he then kept in preference to the tapes? The answer is simple: he used them to plug the band to new, potential record companies after Verve had said goodbye and the silly git didn’t bother keeping the tape, leaving it with the people who actually did the taping.
It’s a great shame that all we have of the demos is the acetates. If only the tape for this resurfaced!
I wrote this some time ago but never got round to "publishing" it on my group jimjims. Feel free to discuss the ideas at length or perhaps offer a different viewpoint.
Sean (aka jimjim)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"...it’s always struck me as odd that in the era that bootlegging was just starting out (Great White Wonder, Get Back & Live R being the 1st 3 to be released that year[1969]) that some dodgy geezers somehow managed to get their hands on high quality, stereo recording equipment to tape their heroes. In addition it also seems odd that they were also sked by the same heroes to come forward to get better sound and then went backstage to tape them in a singalong session. It seems to me very unlikely that someone was that lucky to have all this to hand without “the man” getting suspicious.
One key factor in explaining this is “Live 1969”. It wasn’t until the CD era that we discovered that part of “Live 1969” was taken from fragile acetates as, until then, the vinyl covered all the hidden crack(le)s, so to speak. Perhaps to explain this at the time, it was revealed by some VU aficionados that VU manager Sesnick had handed over mere acetates to Mercury in 1974 for use in this now classic live album. So, when LAECA came out on boot around the same time everyone was stunned by both the appearance of tracks from “Live 1969” and the dramatic difference in sound quality between the official and unofficial versions. The question was asked, “why did Mercury or Sesnick use acetates and not the tape?”. For the moment, we can point the finger at Sesnick for having something to do with the tapes but as yet we do not have the “why?”.
But, there’s one other twist. When putting together LAECA & TFN ["The First Night", its follow-up set] the new bootleggers also discovered a stash of demo tapes tagged on at the end – “I Found A Reason”, “The Countess Of Hong Kong”, “We’re Gonna Have A Real Good Time Together” and “Ride Into The Sun”. These had previously been undocumented and caused a stir when they first appeared at the end of TFN. But also, of interest, it was claimed that these tracks also appeared at the end of the same acetates that were handed over to Mercury all those years ago. When the former two of these tracks were finally released officially in the mid-late 90s it’s interesting that Atlantic were not given a licence credit for using “The Countess..” on PSAS and vice versa for “I Found A Reason” & Polydor in reference to the re-packaged “Loaded”. There is a simple explanation - because neither have the rights to these acetates. Given that the VU were coming to the end of their Verve/MGM contract around the time LAECA was recorded and as both PSAS & Loaded (FLE) claim the demos were recorded not long after, it seems obvious that as no-one has a claim to them, they must have been recorded out of “wedlock”. This may explain why Mercury (who were not then part of Polygram/Universal) were approached over Verve/MGM to release “Live 1969”.
So we have QED: as the idea of a bootlegger in 1969 having access to high quality stereo equipment seems to me very unlikely, is it possible that the source of these tapes is an internal one? Hell, yeah. Either Sesnick or Verve/MGM would be the most likely to have any access to these sorts of things. But Verve wanted to bin the VU at the end of 69 & so that leaves only Sesnick as a source. But why did he record the band independently in demo & live form, then put together an acetate which he then kept in preference to the tapes? The answer is simple: he used them to plug the band to new, potential record companies after Verve had said goodbye and the silly git didn’t bother keeping the tape, leaving it with the people who actually did the taping.
It’s a great shame that all we have of the demos is the acetates. If only the tape for this resurfaced!