Hy Weiss?
Wayback machine is way wrong IMO - see http://www.acerecords.co.uk/gotrt/2003/ ... h2979.html
Weiss had this NY record company - put out some hot doo wop in the late 50s - Lou & Sterl dug some of the stuff. In the late 60s when Wayback has him at Verve, he was still running Old Town, and putting out some respectable soul sides.
Seems like the Harptones' "I Got A Notion" on Old Town from 1955 might be the source of the Weiss infringement.
Weiss had this NY record company - put out some hot doo wop in the late 50s - Lou & Sterl dug some of the stuff. In the late 60s when Wayback has him at Verve, he was still running Old Town, and putting out some respectable soul sides.
Seems like the Harptones' "I Got A Notion" on Old Town from 1955 might be the source of the Weiss infringement.
-
- Head held high
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 06 Mar 2004 12:22
- Location: between thought and expression
Anyone who plays an instrument or better yet in a band themselevs will understand the difference between a song someone wrote and one that was created by jamming. "Countess From Hong Kong" was obviously written by Lou while it's pretty safe to say that "Move Right In" and "Foggy Notion" came together by the band jamming on a groove/riff. Especially now that the Hy Weiss issue (quoting from an old rock'n'roll song...) was pointed out to me I think it's even more obvious that "Foggy Notion" was a jam.alfredovu wrote:Dear Arjan,
I do not know why you consider Foggy Notion as a jam, as I think it is, considering the why the VU performed live thier songs, a song with lyrics and structure. Consider "Moves Right In". This song was recorder also by Yule but credited to Cale. Same as the ones you mentioned and "Countess from Hong Kong" too.
I still believe that FN is wrongly credited to Yule.
The fact that the song has lyrics doesn't mean it's not a jam musically. As does not the fact that it has a certain structure, however, the rhythm and the chords reveal it for what it is.
The only thing that I'd say is "wrong" about the credits is why no Lou?
-
- Head held high
- Posts: 433
- Joined: 07 Mar 2004 21:11
-
- Head held high
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 06 Mar 2004 12:22
- Location: between thought and expression
Elvis Plebsley wrote:Why no credit for Lou? Simple, Hy Weiss sued him.

That's kind of poetic to say the least!Elvis Plebsley wrote:Weiss was also manager of the hip hop band that sampled WOTWS for the song Can I Kick It and Lou sued them and got his money back.

There's something wrong about this story (although Elvis of course retold it faithfully), and it's this. If I write a song that "samples" another one, be it physically as in hip hop or by incorporating lyrics and/or chords, there's two options: either the song becomes a co-write between me and the sampled writer(s), or if my own contribution isn't considered big enough or if their lawyer's "good" enough, it's theirs entirely and it effectively becomes a cover version.Elvis Plebsley wrote:Why no credit for Lou? Simple, Hy Weiss sued him. Lou talks about this on the NYC Boy radio interview. He goes on to say that Weiss was also manager of the hip hop band that sampled WOTWS for the song Can I Kick It and Lou sued them and got his money back.
It looks like Weiss won a co-write, since Yule/Morrison/Tucker are credited for their part of the jam. And maybe Lou's rhythm guitar isn't original enough, but his lyrics surely must be. So he should have got (and, according to BMI, who I swear by, has got) a writing credit for that.
My guess is that Lou just got sour about the thing and disowned his contribution, got his own back from Weiss by suing A Tribe Called Quest, and slightly distorted the story on air.
-
- Head held high
- Posts: 433
- Joined: 07 Mar 2004 21:11
-
- Head held high
- Posts: 433
- Joined: 07 Mar 2004 21:11
Just to be clear, I'm not disputing what Arjan writes, but reporting what Lou himself has said on the matter. It would make sense if the lyrics were seen to be a Weiss/Reed. Musically it makes sense that it be credited Morrisson/Reed/Tucker/Yule, if you leave aside the earlier argument about Cale's involvement. Incidentally I do think it possible that song came into being after Cale left: a rehearsal jam that Lou improvised lyrics for, hence the quote from another song and the resulting legal fight.
Now for Sister Ray, the songwriting credits are awarded to other members quite rightly as far as I understand the situation, because the jam that song was based on took place during rehearsals for the Poor Richards shows (line-up Cale, Maclise, Morrison, Tucker) while Lou was in hospital. The only question is should Maclise have been credited?
Now for Sister Ray, the songwriting credits are awarded to other members quite rightly as far as I understand the situation, because the jam that song was based on took place during rehearsals for the Poor Richards shows (line-up Cale, Maclise, Morrison, Tucker) while Lou was in hospital. The only question is should Maclise have been credited?
-
- Head held high
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 06 Mar 2004 12:22
- Location: between thought and expression
Wasn't the song's first official release on the VU LP? I don't have the record here with me but I seem to remember the credit is the same, is it not?Elvis Plebsley wrote:Homme Fatale wrote:
Even when the guy was credited for "co-writing" the song...?!
He wasn't originally credited, he sued and was awarded Lou's songwriting credit.
Don't know about the LP, but the CD has no writing credits listed whatsoever. It wasn't until PSAS that I saw that Foggy Notion was a group write.Homme Fatale wrote:Wasn't the song's first official release on the VU LP? I don't have the record here with me but I seem to remember the credit is the same, is it not?